Issue: Newsletter 10 | December 1, 2025
| Citation of Articles | PICO | Main Results | Risk of Bias |
|---|---|---|---|
| File TM Jr, Kaye KS, Skliarov I, Hovbakh I, Katsarava V, Kirsch C, et al. Omadacycline versus moxifloxacin for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (OPTIC-2): a phase 3b, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, controlled, noninferiority trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Dec 20;90:103656. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103656 | P: 670 adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (PSI class III–IV; ~50% >65 years) I: Omadacycline (100 mg IV q12h for two doses, then 100 mg IV daily; optional switch to 300 mg oral daily after ≥2 days; total 7–10 days) C: Moxifloxacin (400 mg IV daily; optional 400 mg oral daily after ≥2 days; total 7–10 days) O: Early clinical response at 72–120 h; clinical response at post-therapy evaluation (5–10 days after last dose); microbiologic response by subject and pathogen; safety and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) |
Omadacycline was noninferior to moxifloxacin for early clinical response (89.6% vs 87.7%, difference 1.9%, 95% CI –3.0 to 6.8) and for post-therapy clinical response (86.0% vs 87.7%, difference –1.7%, 95% CI –6.9 to 3.4). Clinical success across key pathogens was high and comparable between groups (omadacycline 74.4–100% vs moxifloxacin 75.0–97.4%). Safety was acceptable, with similar rates of common TEAEs; headache (3.6% vs 4.5%) and mild lab abnormalities were the most frequent, with diarrhoea more common in the moxifloxacin group. Overall, omadacycline was effective, well tolerated, and provided a viable once-daily IV-to-oral monotherapy option for CABP. | Low-to-moderate risk: The randomised, double-blind design reduces performance and detection bias, although industry sponsorship may introduce potential bias in conduct or reporting. Large sample size and balanced groups support internal validity. High follow-up completion and objective clinical endpoints limit attrition and assessment bias. Generalisability may be somewhat limited by the Eastern European study population and predominance of PSI class III patients. |
| Medel-Jara PA, Latorre G, Fuentes-Lopez E, Pizarro M, Viviani P, Chahuan J, et al. Comparison between optimized bismuth quadruple therapy and standard clarithromycin-based triple therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2026 Jan;53:101312. doi:10.1016/j.lana.2025.101312 | P: 127 treatment-naïve adults in Chile with confirmed active H. pylori infection I: Optimized bismuth quadruple therapy for 14 days (esomeprazole 40 mg TID, amoxicillin 1 g TID, metronidazole 500 mg TID, bismuth subsalicylate 369 mg TID) C: Standard triple therapy for 14 days (omeprazole 20 mg BID, amoxicillin 1 g BID, clarithromycin 500 mg BID) O: Successful H. pylori eradication ≥4 weeks post-treatment; adverse events; clarithromycin resistance; CYP2C19 genotype effects |
Optimized bismuth quadruple therapy achieved significantly higher eradication rates than standard triple therapy in intention-to-treat analysis (95% vs 81%, p=0.033). Adverse event rates were similar between groups (67% vs 66%), with no differences in baseline clarithromycin resistance or CYP2C19 polymorphisms. Overall, the optimized bismuth quadruple regimen provided superior eradication efficacy without added toxicity or reduced adherence. | Moderate risk: The randomized double-blind design minimizes performance and detection bias, and balanced baseline characteristics strengthen comparability. The relatively small sample size limits precision, and single-country recruitment may constrain generalizability. Adherence and outcome assessment appear robust, but microbiologic confirmation timing may introduce minor misclassification risk. |
| Abaft S, Yasin Z, Ahmadinia M, Eshraghi A, Gholizadeh Niari B, Minaeian S, et al. Efficacy and safety of colistin–doxycycline combination therapy in multi-drug resistance Gram-negative infections: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Infection. 2025 Nov 20; doi:10.1007/s15010-025-02698-3 | P: 46 adults hospitalized with culture-confirmed multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections I: Colistin–doxycycline combination therapy C: Colistin–meropenem combination therapy O: Clinical cure (resolution without therapy escalation and in-hospital mortality); microbiological eradication; acute kidney injury; treatment-related adverse events; inflammatory resolution; need for mechanical ventilation |
Colistin–doxycycline achieved significantly higher clinical cure rates than colistin–meropenem (87.0% vs 46.7%, p=0.012) and lower mortality (69.6% vs 86.7%, p=0.017). Microbiological eradication was also superior (p=0.016). Nephrotoxicity was numerically lower in the colistin–doxycycline arm (19.1% vs 33.3%, p=0.092), with faster resolution of inflammatory markers and reduced need for mechanical ventilation (60.9% vs 33.3%, p=0.028). Overall, colistin–doxycycline demonstrated improved efficacy with a favorable safety profile compared with colistin–meropenem. | High-to-moderate risk: Although double-blind randomization reduces performance and detection bias, the small sample size (n=46) limits power and increases imprecision. Single-center recruitment and heterogeneous infection severity constrain generalisability. Short follow-up and combined primary endpoint may introduce outcome misclassification. Despite balanced allocation, the small cohort increases susceptibility to chance imbalances and type I error. |
| Lissauer D, Gadama L, Waitt C, Whyte S, Burnside G, Anilkumar A, et al. A multicomponent intervention to improve maternal infection outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2025 Nov 19; doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2512698 | P: 431,394 women who were pregnant or recently pregnant across 59 health facilities in Malawi and Uganda I: APT-Sepsis multicomponent program (supporting adherence to WHO hand hygiene, evidence-based infection prevention and management practices, and early sepsis detection using the FAST-M bundle: fluids, antibiotics, source control, transfer, monitoring) C: Usual care with standard guideline dissemination O: Composite of infection-related maternal death, infection-related near-miss event, or severe infection-related illness (deep surgical-site, deep perineal, or body-cavity infection) |
The APT-Sepsis program significantly reduced the composite primary outcome compared with usual care (1.4% vs 1.9%; risk ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.55–0.83, P<0.001). The effect was consistent across countries, across facilities of varying sizes, and was sustained over time. The intervention improved adherence to evidence-based infection prevention and management practices and enabled earlier identification and treatment of maternal sepsis through implementation of the FAST-M bundle. | Moderate risk: The cluster-randomized design reduces contamination but may introduce imbalance between facilities. Blinding of facilities and providers was not feasible, introducing potential performance bias. However, the extremely large sample size, consistency of effects across clusters, and objective clinical outcome measures strengthen internal validity. Some risk of detection bias remains due to reliance on facility-reported outcomes. |
| de Mesmay M, Geral L, Gregoire C, Roy M, Welschbillig S, Le Cossec C, et al. Effect of paracetamol on cerebral temperature in febrile brain-injured patients: the NEUROTHERM study, a randomized controlled pharmacodynamic trial. Crit Care Med. 2025 Nov 11; doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006951 | P: 99 febrile brain-injured ICU patients (mean age 55 ± 13 yr; 24% female) with cerebral temperature ≥38.5°C for >30 min and monitored via intracerebral thermal probe I: Single IV administration of paracetamol C: Placebo (single IV dose) O: Mean cerebral temperature over 6 hours; systemic temperature; time with cerebral temperature <38.5°C; hemodynamic effects; proportion of non-responders |
Paracetamol significantly reduced mean cerebral temperature over 6 hours compared with placebo (38.4 ± 0.5°C vs 39.0 ± 0.5°C, p<0.001), with cerebral temperatures consistently higher than systemic temperatures in both groups. Patients receiving paracetamol spent markedly more time below 38.5°C (median 215 min vs 0 min, p<0.001). Approximately 30% were non-responders, but responders experienced a 1°C drop. Paracetamol caused modest reductions in systolic blood pressure and heart rate without other major adverse effects. | Moderate risk: The randomized double-blind placebo-controlled design minimizes performance and detection bias. Small sample size limits precision and increases susceptibility to imbalances. Single-center Neuro-ICU setting limits generalizability. Short follow-up captures acute pharmacodynamic response but not longer-term outcomes. Cerebral temperature monitoring is objective, reducing measurement bias. |
| Robinson AL, Boyle MG, Hogan PG, Malone SM, Krauss MJ, Richardson LM, et al. Evaluating personal and environmental decolonization strategies for children with skin and soft tissue infection and their households: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Nov 24;ciaf627. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaf627 | P: 196 children with community-associated Staphylococcus aureus SSTI and 623 household contacts (entire household enrolled) I: Periodic-Personal decolonization (twice-weekly chlorhexidine bathing + monthly intranasal mupirocin), Environmental-Hygiene (weekly surface disinfection + enhanced laundry), or an Integrated-Approach combining both (primary comparison: Integrated vs combined other two groups) C: Combined comparator of Periodic-Personal or Environmental-Hygiene interventions O: Household-level cumulative SSTI at 3 months; SSTI incidence at 6 and 9 months; personal and household S. aureus colonization (MRSA/MSSA) |
Cumulative SSTI incidence at 3 months did not differ between the Integrated-Approach and the combined Periodic-Personal and Environmental-Hygiene groups. However, among index patients and contacts with SSTI in the prior year, the Integrated-Approach resulted in lower SSTI incidence at 6 and 9 months. Multivariable analyses showed prior-year SSTI strongly predicted subsequent SSTI, whereas intervention group assignment was not a significant predictor. All interventions reduced MRSA—though not MSSA—personal colonization over 9 months, and environmental interventions did not significantly affect overall SSTI outcomes. | Moderate risk: The open-label design introduces performance and detection bias, especially with behavior-dependent interventions. Clustered household enrollment reduces contamination but increases complexity and risk of imbalance. Long enrollment period (2015–2021) may introduce temporal confounding. Outcome assessment relied partly on self-reported SSTIs, adding potential misclassification. Nevertheless, randomization, structured follow-up, and biological sampling strengthen internal validity. |
| Sun F, Li Y, Zhang Y, Cai C, Chen Y, Yi H, et al. A 6 to 9-month oral regimen for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: a randomised open-label non-inferiority trial in China. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2025 Nov 23; doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2025.11.015 | P: 354 adults in China with rifampicin-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis (randomized from 660 screened) I: 6–9-month all-oral regimen: levofloxacin, linezolid, cycloserine, clofazimine and/or pyrazinamide C: 9-month injectable-containing regimen (control) O: Favourable outcome at 84 weeks (two consecutive negative cultures with no prior unfavourable outcome); grade 3–5 adverse events |
The all-oral regimen was noninferior to the injectable-containing regimen, with higher favourable outcomes in the modified intention-to-treat population (76.1% vs 63.7%, difference 12.4%, 95% CI 2.4–22.5) and in per-protocol analysis (84.4% vs 73.5%, difference 10.9%, 95% CI 1.1–20.7). Severe adverse events were less frequent in the oral regimen (59.5% vs 69.1%), particularly QTcF prolongation (29.5% vs 44.6%) and hepatobiliary disorders (7.5% vs 21.7%). Overall, the all-oral regimen demonstrated better tolerability and comparable or superior efficacy. | Moderate risk: The open-label design may introduce performance and detection bias, though objective culture-based primary outcomes mitigate this. Randomization and predefined noninferiority margins strengthen internal validity. However, only 354 of 660 screened participants were randomized, raising potential selection bias. Differential follow-up across treatment durations and reliance on per-protocol analysis add risk of attrition bias. Generalizability is limited to similar programmatic TB settings without access to newer WHO-recommended drugs. |
Hindler JA, Schuetz AN. CLSI AST news update. CLSI AST News Updates. 2025;11(1)
Suzuki K, Otsuka H. Lemierre’s syndrome. JMA J. 2025 Oct 15;8(4):1423–4. doi:10.31662/jmaj.2025-0207
Alpert E, Silk H, Simon L. Dental caries in adults. JAMA. 2025 Nov 12; doi:10.1001/jama.2025.19029

Copyright © ADVANCE-ID. All rights reserved.
ADVANCE-ID
Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health
National University of Singapore
Tahir Foundation Building
National University of Singapore
12 Science Drive 2, #10-01, Singapore 117549
+65 6516 4988