001

Issue: Newsletter 28 | September 1, 2026

ADVANCE-ID Bacterial and Fungal Infections Newsletter - Issue 28
Citation of Articles PICO Main Results Risk of Bias

Bundgaard H, Pries-Heje M, Hjulmand J, Hasselbalch R, Jørgensen PG, Fanø S, et al. Response-tailored or standard-duration antibiotic treatment for infective endocarditis. N Engl J Med. 2026 Aug 28; doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2607887

P: 508 patients with infective endocarditis on the left side of the heart caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, or streptococcus species, who had already received 2–4 weeks of standard therapy and met criteria for clinical stabilization (255 randomised to tailored therapy, 253 to standard-duration therapy)

I: Response-tailored antibiotic therapy (antibiotics discontinued once stabilization criteria were met)

C: Standard-duration antibiotic therapy (total duration 4–6 weeks)

O: Days alive without antibiotic treatment for infective endocarditis or bacteremia within 6 months (efficacy, tested for superiority); composite of death, unplanned cardiac surgery, or symptomatic embolic events within 6 months (safety, tested for noninferiority, margin 7.5 percentage points); relapse of bacteremia/infective endocarditis (key secondary)

Response-tailored therapy resulted in a longer median time alive without antibiotics than standard-duration therapy (183 days vs 169 days; Hodges–Lehmann difference 13 days, 95% CI 12–13; p<0.001 for superiority). The primary safety composite occurred in 8.2% of the tailored group versus 10.7% of the standard group (absolute difference −2.4 percentage points, 95% CI −7.7 to 2.7), meeting the criterion for noninferiority. However, relapse of bacteremia or infective endocarditis was more frequent with tailored therapy (5.1% vs 1.6%; p=0.04); overall, tailored therapy reduced antibiotic exposure without compromising the composite safety endpoint but was associated with a higher relapse rate.

Moderate risk: The open-label design could introduce performance or detection bias in an outcome that includes clinician-driven decisions (e.g., unplanned cardiac surgery), though the primary efficacy endpoint (days alive without antibiotics) is relatively objective. The noninferiority margin (7.5 percentage points) is fairly wide, and the higher relapse rate in the tailored-therapy arm, despite meeting the composite safety noninferiority criterion, suggests the composite endpoint may not fully capture clinically important harm. Large sample size (508) and clear stabilization criteria before randomization strengthen internal validity.

Basnyat B, Adhikari S, Shrestha P, Budhathoki S, Hossain MS, Ahmed N, et al. Azithromycin with or without cefixime for suspected or culture-confirmed uncomplicated typhoid fever in Nepal, Bangladesh, and Pakistan (ACT-South Asia): a double-blind, parallel-group, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 4 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2026 Aug 20; doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(26)00358-0

P: 1831 participants (modified intention-to-treat population) aged 2–65 years with blood culture-confirmed or clinically suspected uncomplicated typhoid fever across 13 hospitals in Nepal, Bangladesh, and Pakistan (915 azithromycin–cefixime, 916 azithromycin–placebo; 350 with blood culture-confirmed typhoid)

I: Oral azithromycin (20 mg/kg, max 1 g, once daily) plus oral cefixime (10 mg/kg, max 400 mg, twice daily) for 7 days

C: Oral azithromycin plus matched placebo for 7 days

O: Composite treatment failure (fever clearance time ≥7 days, microbiological failure at day 7, need for rescue treatment, or complication/relapse within 28 days); fever clearance time (secondary)

Treatment failure occurred in 5.10% of both groups (44/915 vs 44/916; absolute risk difference 0.00 percentage points, 95% CI −2.08 to 2.08; p=1.00). Among blood culture-confirmed participants, treatment failure occurred in 11.16% (19/179) of the azithromycin–cefixime group versus 16.00% (26/171) of the azithromycin–placebo group (difference 4.84 percentage points, 95% CI −2.52 to 12.21; p=0.20). Fever clearance time was similar between groups (median 1.83 vs 1.80 days overall; acceleration factor 0.99, 95% CI 0.90–1.09; p=0.86). Adverse events occurred in 16% of each group; overall, adding cefixime to azithromycin gave no additional benefit over azithromycin alone, supporting the WHO recommendation of azithromycin monotherapy.

Low risk: Double-blind, placebo-controlled design with concealed, computer-generated block randomisation stratified by site and age minimises performance and detection bias. Large sample size (1831) recruited across three countries and a prespecified statistical analysis plan strengthen internal validity and generalisability. Loss to follow-up (147 vs 114 participants) was moderate but broadly similar between groups, limiting attrition bias.

Denninghoff KR, Casper TC, Zorc JJ, Ruddy RM, Satola S, Wendt WJ, et al. Azithromycin for Preschoolers with Wheezing in the Emergency Department. N Engl J Med. 2026 May 18; doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2516505

Editorial commentary:

Bush A, Saglani S. No to azithromycin for preschoolers with acute wheezing in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2026 Aug 19; doi:10.1056/NEJMe2606675

P: 840 patients aged 18–59 months presenting to the emergency department with moderate-to-severe acute wheezing (521 tested positive for pathogenic bacteria [Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Haemophilus influenzae] — the positive cohort; the remainder formed the negative cohort)

I: Azithromycin 12 mg/kg once daily for 5 days

C: Matching placebo for 5 days

O: Sum of Asthma Flare-up Diary for Young Children (ADYC) scores over 5 days (range 5–35, higher = more severe symptoms), assessed separately in positive and negative cohorts; secondary outcomes were emergency department length of stay, hospital length of stay, and return visits/hospitalizations within 72 hours

ADYC scores did not differ significantly between azithromycin and placebo in either the positive cohort (median 9.59 vs 9.72; p=0.70) or the negative cohort (median 9.30 vs 9.10; p=0.69). In the positive cohort, bacterial clearance was substantially higher with azithromycin than placebo (58.7% vs 11.4%). Secondary outcomes, development of antimicrobial resistance, and adverse events were similar between groups; the trial was stopped early for futility after a planned interim analysis; overall, azithromycin did not reduce wheezing-related symptom severity compared with placebo despite achieving greater bacterial clearance.

Low risk: Randomised, placebo-controlled design with prespecified interim analysis and independent data and safety monitoring board oversight support internal validity. Early stopping for futility, while appropriate given a lack of efficacy signal, reduces the trial's power to detect smaller effects or differences in secondary and safety outcomes. Separate analysis by bacterial-positive and bacterial-negative cohorts strengthens interpretability of the dissociation between microbiological and clinical response.

Kim KJ, Yoon YK, Kim JY, Kim MJ, Sohn JW, Nam MH. Clinical impact of rapid molecular diagnosis of bloodstream infections: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2026 Aug 20; doi:10.1093/cid/ciag511

P: 418 patients with positive blood cultures, both arms receiving antimicrobial stewardship (208 standard of care [SOC], 210 multiplex PCR)

I: SOC plus BioFire BCID2 multiplex PCR testing

C: SOC (culture and phenotypic susceptibility testing) alone

O: Time to first effective antimicrobial modification within 120h (primary); persistent bloodstream infection, mortality, length of stay (secondary)

Time to first effective antimicrobial modification was significantly shorter with multiplex PCR (23.2 vs 64.5h; p<0.001), consistent across gram-negative, gram-positive, and yeast infections and regardless of lab hours or ICU status. Persistent bloodstream infection was lower with multiplex PCR (5.7% vs 11.5%, p=0.038). No significant differences in 30-day mortality or length of stay; overall, rapid multiplex PCR shortened time to effective therapy without affecting mortality or length of stay.

Low-to-moderate risk: Randomised 1:1 design with a clear, objective primary endpoint supports internal validity, though the open-label nature of antimicrobial decision-making may introduce performance bias. Adequate sample size (418) for the primary endpoint but likely underpowered for mortality and length-of-stay secondary outcomes.

Millot G, Rouze A, Wallet F, Loiez C, Preau S, Bureau C, et al. Impact of a strategy using multiplex PCR on targeted antibiotic therapy for patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia or hospital-acquired pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation: a randomized, single-blind trial. Intensive Care Med. 2026 Aug 20; doi:10.1007/s00134-026-08591-3

P: 146 analyzed immunocompetent adults with suspected ventilator-associated (84.9%) or hospital-acquired pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation (74 intervention, 72 control); median age 58 years

I: FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (FAPP) plus conventional microbiology

C: Conventional microbiology alone

O: Proportion of patients receiving targeted antimicrobial therapy (AMT) at 24h

Targeted AMT at 24h occurred in 35.1% of the FAPP group vs 23.6% of controls (absolute difference 11.5%, 95% CI −0.03 to 26.2; p=0.13) — not statistically significant overall. Among patients with culture-documented pneumonia (45.9%), targeted AMT at 24h was significantly higher with FAPP (55.3% vs 31.0%; p=0.048). Secondary outcomes did not differ significantly; overall, FAPP increased targeted AMT only in patients with confirmed pneumonia.

Moderate risk: Open-label design could introduce performance and detection bias in antimicrobial decision-making. Small sample size (146) limits power, reflected in the wide CI crossing zero for the primary outcome. Ten of 156 randomised patients withdrew consent, introducing minor attrition bias.

Zhang H, Lin K, Xu X, Yue Q, Li X, Chen X, et al. Diagnostic performance and antibiotic impact of droplet digital PCR in suspected sepsis: the PROGRESS trial. Nat Commun. 2026 Aug 20; doi:10.1038/s41467-026-76767-y

P: 1373 patients with suspected sepsis followed for 90 days across 14 centres, randomised 3:1

I: Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)-guided pathogen monitoring and antibiotic adjustment

C: Standard of care

O: Diagnostic efficacy (primary); mortality and SOFA score (secondary)

ddPCR showed higher detection positivity than standard care (54.1% vs 21.6%, p<2×10⁻¹⁶), faster turnaround, and 80.6% sensitivity. It increased appropriate antimicrobial coverage (12.91% vs 6.1%, p=0.0039), and coverage achieved within 0–3 days was associated with improved outcomes (p=0.026); overall, ddPCR-guided precision antimicrobial adjustment increased appropriate coverage and translated into improved survival.

Moderate risk: Unequal 3:1 randomisation and lack of blinding for the standard-care comparator could introduce performance bias. Large sample size (1373) across 14 centres strengthens generalisability. Mortality-predicting pathogen-load thresholds were derived from the same dataset without external validation, risking overfitting.

Zhang X, Wang F, Zheng Y, Sun X, Lin L, Tang X, et al. Antimicrobial glucose chlorhexidine dressings vs. sterile dressings in preventing catheter-related infections during continuous renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Semin Dial. 2026 Jul 31; doi:10.1111/sdi.70042

P: 410 ICU patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy via nontunneled femoral catheters (205 per group)

I: Antimicrobial glucose chlorhexidine dressing, changed every 7 days

C: Sterile gauze dressing, changed every 48 hours

O: Local infection at catheter insertion site; suspected/confirmed catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI); hospital/ICU stay; mortality

Local infection at the insertion site was significantly lower with chlorhexidine dressings (15.6% vs 40.0%, p<0.001). Total CRBSI rate was also lower (6.3% vs 13.7%, p=0.014); confirmed CRBSI, hospital/ICU stay, and mortality did not differ significantly; overall, chlorhexidine dressings reduced local infection and overall CRBSI without affecting harder clinical endpoints.

Moderate risk: Single-blind design (patients masked, staff possibly not) could introduce detection bias for infection assessment. Adequate a priori sample size and balanced baseline characteristics strengthen validity, though exclusive femoral access (rather than the guideline-preferred internal jugular site) limits generalisability.

Sawe F, Koech L, Neffati S, Korir B, Laird RM, Odundo E, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of the synthetic carbohydrate conjugate vaccine, SF2a-TT15, against Shigella flexneri 2a in infants in Kenya: a phase 2a, age-descending, dose-escalating, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2026 Aug 19; doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(26)00307-5

P: 216 healthy Kenyan infants aged 9±1 months randomised across six dose/adjuvant/placebo arms (20–46 per group), plus 16 adults and 16 children in earlier dose-escalation cohorts

I: SF2a-TT15 conjugate vaccine (2μg or 10μg oligosaccharide dose, adjuvanted or non-adjuvanted), days 0, 90, 270

C: Matching adjuvanted or non-adjuvanted placebo

O: Incidence/severity of adverse events (primary safety); serum IgG GMT/GMR and proportion of responders to SF2a lipopolysaccharide (primary immunogenicity)

SF2a-TT15 was well tolerated with no vaccine-related serious adverse events; 94% of infants had at least one unsolicited adverse event, mostly mild-to-moderate and unrelated to study product. The vaccine induced significantly higher serum IgG GMTs than placebo at 28 days after each injection (p<0.001 for nearly all comparisons), with the adjuvanted 10μg dose eliciting the highest titres and up to 100% responders after the second injection; overall, SF2a-TT15 was safe and strongly immunogenic in infants.

Low-to-moderate risk: Double-blind, placebo-controlled design with masked outcome assessment supports internal validity. Small, uneven group sizes (20–46 per arm) across six infant dose/adjuvant combinations limit power for between-group comparisons. Retention varied by group (as low as 46% per-protocol in the first-enrolled arm due to procedural difficulties), introducing some attrition bias.

Mboizi R, Sekikubo M, Businge GB, Mukasa Z, Musoke P, Rukundo G, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of GBS6 in pregnant women living with and without HIV and their infants in Uganda (PREPARE WP4): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 clinical trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2026 Aug 25; doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(26)00318-X

Editorial commentary:
Obaro SK, Medugu N. Curbing neonatal group B streptococcus disease burden. Lancet Infect Dis. 2026 Aug 25; doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(26)00408-1

P: 300 pregnant women in Uganda (150 living with HIV, 150 without), aged 18–40, 27–35 weeks' gestation, randomised 1:1 within HIV strata

I: Single intramuscular dose of GBS6 hexavalent capsular polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (20μg)

C: Saline placebo

O: Maternal/infant safety through 12 months postpartum (primary); anti-serotype IgG concentrations and placental antibody transfer (secondary)

Serious adverse events were similar across groups and none were vaccine-related. GBS6 induced serotype-specific IgG increases 30–100-fold from baseline, with no difference by maternal HIV status (p>0.05 for all serotypes). Infants born to vaccinated mothers had substantially higher antibody concentrations at birth than placebo recipients' infants, sustained above placebo through 18 weeks; overall, GBS6 was safe and immunogenic regardless of maternal HIV status, with effective placental transfer.

Low risk: Double-blind design with pharmacist-masked syringe preparation and HIV-stratified randomisation minimises performance/detection bias. High retention to delivery (298/300). Study population had high CD4+ counts and was stable on antiretroviral therapy, limiting generalisability to women with advanced or untreated HIV.

Rubinstein F, Morelli DM, Palma I, Sanjurjo M, Morales R, Bornengo F, et al. Evaluation of patient centred digital adherence technology for tuberculosis treatment outcomes: pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2026 Aug 6; doi:10.1136/bmj-2026-100195

P: 525 patients (intention-to-treat) aged ≥16 years with newly diagnosed drug-susceptible tuberculosis across four Buenos Aires hospitals (255 intervention, 270 control)

I: Standard of care plus TB-TST digital adherence app (daily reporting, messaging, education, weekly urine isoniazid test)

C: Standard of care alone

O: Treatment success — cure or completion (primary); loss to follow-up (secondary)

Treatment success was higher with TB-TST (82% vs 74%; risk ratio 1.10, p=0.04). Loss to follow-up was lower (17% vs 24%; risk ratio 0.70, p=0.04). Per-protocol analysis showed larger effects (84% vs 74%, p<0.01). Benefit was greater among women and participants under 35; overall, the digital tool improved TB treatment outcomes, particularly in younger and female patients.

Moderate risk: Lack of participant/provider blinding (inherent to a digital intervention) could introduce performance bias, though masked outcome assessors reduce detection bias. Per-protocol analysis excluding non-engaged participants may overstate the effect. COVID-19-related disruptions and uneven enrolment across sites (one site contributing 51% of participants, with better outcomes in both arms) introduce site-level heterogeneity.

Nduba V, Mathebula M, Nankabirwa V, Dempster M, Mhimbira F, Sabi I, et al. Comparison of VPM1002 with BCG in the prevention of tuberculosis in newborn infants: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2026 Aug 18; doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(26)00374-9

Editorial commentary:
McShane H. Lessons from another negative tuberculosis vaccine trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2026 Aug 18; doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(26)00412-3

P: 6940 healthy newborns (0–14 days, birthweight ≥2.3kg) across ten sub-Saharan African sites, including 720 born to mothers living with HIV (3471 VPM1002, 3469 BCG analyzed)

I: Single 0.05mL intradermal VPM1002 (recombinant BCG)

C: Single 0.05mL intradermal standard BCG

O: Non-inferiority for prevention of M. tuberculosis infection, defined by incident QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT) conversion (non-inferiority margin: upper 95% CI of HR <1.25)

QFT conversion occurred in 5.3% (VPM1002) vs 4.3% (BCG), HR 1.23 (95% CI 0.99–1.53), exceeding the pre-specified non-inferiority margin — VPM1002 did not demonstrate non-inferiority. Adverse event profiles were similar between groups with no vaccine-related serious adverse events; overall, VPM1002 failed to show non-inferiority to BCG, and secondary disease endpoints numerically favoured BCG.

Moderate risk: Large sample size (6940) and central, HIV-stratified randomisation strengthen validity, though unmasked vaccine-preparation staff could introduce minor performance bias. Early termination due to lower-than-expected event rate (334 of 632 planned events) reduced power and certainty. A ~33% imbalance in household TB exposure between arms is an unaddressed confounder.

Cossa M, Ndege R, Meggi B, Mangu C, Leukes V, Sabi I, et al; TB-CAPT Consortium. Expanding Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and lateral flow urine lipoarabinomannan testing for diagnosis of tuberculosis among adults living with HIV admitted to hospitals in Tanzania and Mozambique (EXULTANT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2026 Sep;26(9):881-893; doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(26)00133-7

P: 1,172 hospitalised adults living with HIV in 11 hospitals in Tanzania and Mozambique, without an existing TB diagnosis or recent TB treatment (61% female; median age 44 years; 75.4% on ART; median CD4 count 232 cells/μL)

I: Expanded universal TB screening with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra testing of sputum, stool and urine plus urine LF-LAM testing, irrespective of symptoms (n=582)

C: Standard-of-care WHO-recommended symptom-based screening with sputum Xpert Ultra and urine LF-LAM according to eligibility criteria (n=590)

O: Microbiologically confirmed TB with treatment initiation within 72 h (primary); 8-week all-cause mortality; TB diagnosis and treatment initiation; time to TB diagnosis/treatment

Moderate risk: Computer-generated, site-stratified randomisation with concealed allocation, balanced baseline characteristics, intention-to-treat analysis and similar per-protocol findings strengthen internal validity. However, the pragmatic trial was unblinded, allowing potential performance bias, and there were protocol deviations and some over-testing in the control group. Follow-up at 8 weeks was incomplete (~69–73%), and the study was underpowered to detect smaller-than-anticipated differences because the incremental diagnostic yield of expanded testing was lower than expected.

Kumar M, Singh A, Singh R, Dhar N, Singh J, Tiwari A, et al. Comparison of ethambutol versus streptomycin during the intensive phase in treatment of tuberculous meningitis: an open-label randomized clinical trial. Postgrad Med J. 2026 Aug 21;102(1211):826-832; doi:10.1093/postmj/qgag021

P: 82 adults with tuberculous meningitis (TBM) enrolled in a single-centre trial (42 streptomycin; 40 ethambutol)

I: Streptomycin 15 mg/kg intramuscularly daily plus isoniazid, rifampicin and pyrazinamide during the intensive phase, followed by rifampicin and isoniazid

C: Ethambutol 15 mg/kg orally daily plus isoniazid, rifampicin and pyrazinamide during the intensive phase, followed by rifampicin and isoniazid

O: 6-month mortality (primary); in-hospital mortality; neurological disability at 3 and 6 months; adverse events

Six-month mortality did not differ significantly between streptomycin and ethambutol (28.6% [12/42] vs 35.0% [14/40]; HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.36–1.70, p=0.54), with no significant differences in in-hospital mortality or neurological disability at 3 or 6 months. Two patients in the streptomycin group developed ototoxicity and two in the ethambutol group developed vision loss. Overall, ethambutol and streptomycin showed similar effectiveness and safety, although the trial lacked sufficient power to reliably exclude a clinically meaningful difference.

High risk: The open-label design could introduce performance and detection bias, particularly for assessment of neurological disability. The very small sample size (82 patients) and early termination due to slow recruitment substantially reduced statistical power, as reflected by the wide confidence interval around the mortality estimate. The single-centre design also limits generalizability, although baseline characteristics were balanced and intention-to-treat analysis was used.

Paris V, Buultjens AH, Bell N, Schmidt TL, Bamberg WM, Birrell MT, et al. Autodissemination stations suppress Aedes notoscriptus mosquitoes and reduce Buruli ulcer risk in urban Australia: a randomized controlled field trial. Nat Microbiol. 2026 Sep;11(9):2493-2504; doi:10.1038/s41564-026-02439-8

P: 12 geographic areas (~80 residential houses per area) in a 50-km² Buruli ulcer-endemic urban region of Melbourne, Australia; 6 areas were randomized to intervention and 6 to control

I: ~100 In2Care autodissemination mosquito stations per intervention area for 8 weeks, containing pyriproxyfen larvicide and Beauveria bassiana entomopathogenic fungus

C: Control areas with no autodissemination stations

O: Aedes notoscriptus mosquito population measured by egg counts (primary); exploratory/post-hoc human Buruli ulcer incidence

Autodissemination stations reduced average mosquito egg counts by 70.3% across intervention areas compared with controls during the 3 weeks after intervention, with significantly fewer positive ovitraps after intervention (33.4% vs 52.7%, p<0.001). In a post-hoc analysis of Buruli ulcer notifications, there was no significant difference in inferred infection risk across the overall 8-week intervention period (RR 1.023, 95% CI 0.874–1.231); however, at the predicted peak intervention effect, Buruli ulcer incidence was 83% lower in intervention than control zones (1 vs 6 cases; IRR 0.167, 95% CI 0.026–1.054, p=0.047), with mosquito suppression strongly correlated with reduced disease risk (R²=0.85). Overall, the intervention effectively suppressed Ae. notoscriptus, while the apparent reduction in Buruli ulcer risk is exploratory and requires confirmation.

Moderate risk: Random assignment of matched geographic areas and contemporaneous controls strengthen the assessment of the primary mosquito outcome. However, only 12 areas were randomized, the intervention lasted just 8 weeks, and mosquito egg counts were not measured during the intervention itself. More importantly, Buruli ulcer incidence was not a prespecified primary outcome and was assessed post hoc using very few cases, inferred exposure dates and multiple sliding-window comparisons without adjustment for multiple testing; therefore, the reported disease reduction should be interpreted cautiously.

Trial Protocols / Trial Ideas

Guidelines and Recommendations

Phage Therapy

Antibiotic Therapy Reviews

PK/PD and Drug Dosing

Antibiotics - In vitro susceptibility

Beta-Lactamases and Other Resistance Mechanisms

Molecular and proteomic epidemiology

Antibiotic Stewardship and Hospital in the Home

Infection Prevention / Antibiotic Prophylaxis

Bloodstream Infections and Endocarditis

Gastrointestinal Tract Infections

Bone and Joint Infections

Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

CNS Infections

Respiratory Tract Infections

Urinary Tract Infections

Infections in Children

Mycobacterial Infections

Fungal Infections and antifungal agents

Host Response in Infection

Diagnostics

Improving Clinical Research

General Interest

Logo-Lockup

Copyright © ADVANCE-ID. All rights reserved.

ADVANCE-ID
Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health
National University of Singapore

Tahir Foundation Building
National University of Singapore
12 Science Drive 2, #10-01, Singapore 117549
+65 6516 4988