Issue: Newsletter 4 | September 1, 2025
Citation of Articles | PICO | Main Results | Risk of Bias |
---|---|---|---|
Menonli Adjobimey, Anete Trajman, Mayara Lisboa Bastos, Chantal Valiquette, Diana Gibson, Frimege Djohoun, et al. Rapid molecular testing or chest X-ray or tuberculin skin testing for household contact assessment of tuberculosis infection: A cluster-randomized trial. PLoS Med. 2025 Jul 28;22(7):e1004666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004666 |
P: 1,589 household contacts (HHC) aged 5–50 of patients with newly diagnosed drug-susceptible pulmonary TB in Benin and Brazil I: Three evaluation strategies: Standard (TST + CXR if TST+), Rapid Molecular Test (TST + RMT if TST+), No-TST (CXR for all, no TST) C: Comparison between the three strategies O: Primary: TPT initiation among eligible HHC; Secondary: completion of investigations, detection of TB disease, TPT completion, adverse events, societal costs |
Among 1,589 household contacts enrolled, 802 of 848 eligible for TB preventive therapy (TPT) initiated treatment, with similar rates across the Standard (95%), Rapid Molecular Test (RMT, 94%), and No-TST (95%) strategies. Completion of protocol-mandated investigations to detect TB infection and rule out TB disease was high overall (93.4%), with minor differences between arms (Standard 93%, RMT 95%, No-TST 93%). Adverse events leading to TPT discontinuation were rare (3 participants, 0.4%). TPT completion was comparable between Standard and RMT strategies but was 13% lower in the No-TST arm. Societal costs per HHC completing investigations were lowest for RMT ($52), moderate for Standard ($61), and highest for No-TST ($74). These results suggest that TST-guided evaluation with selective use of CXR or RMT achieves high TPT initiation at reasonable cost. | Moderate risk: The open-label design could introduce performance or detection bias, although cluster randomization and stratification by country strengthen internal validity. High completion rates minimize attrition bias, but a potential study effect may have influenced adherence by healthcare providers and participants. |
Taylor SP, Eaton T, Rios A, Boyd D, Tapp H, McWilliams A, et al. Proactive telehealth-based sepsis transition and recovery support, hospital readmission, and mortality: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Aug 11;e253699. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.3699 |
P: 3,548 adults hospitalized with sepsis at 7 US hospitals (median age 68, 52% women; 33% ICU admissions) I: STAR program – a multicomponent, navigator-led, telehealth-based intervention delivering proactive, evidence-driven post-sepsis care for 90 days after discharge C: Usual care – standard post-discharge management without STAR intervention O: Primary: composite of all-cause hospital readmission or mortality within 90 days of discharge; Secondary: individual components (readmission, mortality) |
Among 3,548 sepsis survivors, engagement with the STAR program was 66%, but the composite outcome of all-cause readmission or mortality at 90 days did not differ between STAR and usual care (48.2% vs 48.0%; adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.90–1.24; P = .53). When examined separately, mortality was slightly lower in the STAR group (17.3% vs 20.5%; adjusted OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77–0.99; P = .04), while readmission was slightly higher (35.9% vs 33.5%; adjusted OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.92–1.38; P = .24). The STAR program did not reduce the combined endpoint of readmission or death at 90 days. | Moderate risk: Stepped-wedge cluster design may introduce temporal or cluster-level confounding, and open-label implementation could affect care or reporting. High follow-up and objective outcomes strengthen validity, but variable engagement with the intervention (only 66% participated at least once) may have diluted potential effects. |
Aydin A, Golian M, Klein A, Redpath C, Davis DR, Ramirez FD, et al. Iodinated adhesive drapes for repeat cardiac implantable device implantation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Aug 27. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2025.2835 |
P: 418 patients undergoing repeat cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures. I: Application of iodine-impregnated adhesive drape during implantation. C: No drape used. O: Primary: pocket-swab culture positivity at end of procedure. Secondary: adjudicated CIED infections within 1 year. |
Use of iodine-impregnated drapes halved intraoperative contamination rates (10.1% vs 20.5%, relative risk reduction 50%, 95% CI 24–75%, P=.005) and eliminated CIED infections compared with the control group (0/189 vs 4/195, P=.02). Infections were more frequent in patients with positive swabs, though the association did not reach statistical significance. Overall, the intervention was simple, low-cost, and effective in reducing contamination and subsequent infections. | Low risk: Randomization and blinding of patients, swabbing staff, and microbiologists strengthen validity. Single-center design may limit external generalizability, and modest sample size may underpower detection of rare infection outcomes. However, balanced groups and complete follow-up reduce attrition and selection bias. |
Eubank TA, Jo J, Alam MJ, Begum K, McPherson JK, Le TM, et al. Efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and associated microbiome changes of ibezapolstat compared with vancomycin in adults with Clostridioides difficile infection: a phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, multicentre study. Lancet Microbe. 2025;6:101126. doi:10.1016/j.lanmic.2025.101126 |
P: 32 adults (18–90 years) with C. difficile infection at 15 US centers. I: Oral ibezapolstat 450 mg twice daily for 10 days. C: Oral vancomycin 125 mg every 6 h for 10 days. O: Primary – initial clinical cure (symptom resolution maintained ≥48h post-treatment); Secondary – safety, tolerability, microbiome effects. |
Among 30 evaluable participants, clinical cure occurred in 15/16 (94%) in the ibezapolstat group and 14/14 (100%) in the vancomycin group (difference –6.3%, 95% CI –30.7 to 19.4; p=1.0). Ibezapolstat was well tolerated, with no drug-related serious adverse events, treatment withdrawals, or deaths, and showed a safety profile comparable to vancomycin. These results support ibezapolstat as a promising candidate for initial C. difficile infection treatment with potential benefits for recurrence prevention. | High risk: Small sample size (n=32) and limited power restrict conclusions. Double-blind randomization and masking strengthen internal validity, but wide confidence intervals around efficacy estimates limit precision. Single-country, multi-center design improves consistency but reduces external generalizability. No microbiome data were detailed in the results, limiting mechanistic insights. |
Philpott
C, Beard DJ, Saeedi E, Cook JA, Jones S, Clarke CS, et al. The clinical
effectiveness of clarithromycin versus endoscopic sinus surgery for adults
with chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps (MACRO): a
pragmatic, multicentre, three-arm, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 4
trial. Lancet. 2025;406(10506):926-939. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01248-6 Editorial: Huang Z, Zhou B. Endoscopic sinus surgery versus macrolides in chronic rhinosinusitis: redefining clinical priorities. Lancet. 2025;406(10506):887-889. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01253-X |
P: 514 adults (≥18 years) with chronic
rhinosinusitis (with or without nasal polyps) remaining symptomatic despite
intranasal therapy. I: (1) Endoscopic sinus surgery plus intranasal corticosteroids and saline irrigations; (2) Clarithromycin 250 mg BID ×2 weeks then daily ×10 weeks plus intranasal therapy. C: Placebo plus intranasal therapy. O: Primary – disease-specific quality of life at 6 months (SNOT-22 score). Secondary – adverse events, safety. |
At 6 months, endoscopic sinus surgery significantly improved quality of life compared with clarithromycin (adjusted mean difference –18.13, 98.33% CI –24.26 to –11.99, p<0.0001) and placebo (–20.44, –26.42 to –14.46, p<0.0001). Clarithromycin did not significantly differ from placebo (–3.11, –8.56 to 2.33, p=0.17). Serious adverse events were rare and balanced across groups (2 in clarithromycin, 3 in placebo, 5 in surgery), with none fatal. Overall, surgery was superior to medical therapy, while long-term macrolide use showed no clinical benefit. | Low to moderate risk: Randomization and blinding of medical therapy arms minimized bias, though surgical arm could not be blinded, introducing performance and detection bias. Large multicenter recruitment improves external validity. Attrition was low, and intention-to-treat analysis strengthens reliability. The pragmatic design reflects real-world practice but surgical outcomes may depend on operator expertise and local wait times. |
Shen S,
Yan B, Wang M, Wu D, Piao Y, Tang J, et al. Stapokibart for severe
uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: the CROWNS-2
randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2025 Aug 18. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.12515 Editorial: Platt MP, Gray ST, Peters AT. Phenotype to endotype—the future of chronic rhinosinusitis. JAMA. 2025 Aug 18. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.10887 |
P: 179 adults with severe chronic
rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps from 51 hospitals in China, all on daily
intranasal corticosteroid and with prior systemic corticosteroid use or
sinonasal surgery. I: Subcutaneous stapokibart 300 mg every 2 weeks for 24 weeks (after 4 weeks of mometasone furoate nasal spray). C: Placebo every 2 weeks for 24 weeks (after 4 weeks of mometasone furoate), then open-label stapokibart for 28 weeks. O: Changes in nasal polyp score and nasal congestion score at week 24. |
Stapokibart significantly reduced nasal polyp size (LS mean change −2.6 vs −0.3 points; LS mean difference −2.3; 95% CI −2.6 to −1.9; P<.001) and nasal congestion (−1.2 vs −0.5; LS mean difference −0.7; 95% CI −0.9 to −0.5; P<.001) in the overall population at 24 weeks. Effects were larger in patients with eosinophilia (polyp score change −3.0 vs −0.4; nasal congestion −1.3 vs −0.5). Serious adverse events were rare; stapokibart had higher rates of arthralgia (7.8% vs 0%) and hyperuricemia (5.6% vs 1.1%). | Low–moderate risk: Randomized, double-blind design reduces selection and performance bias. Multicenter design and high follow-up rates strengthen validity. Some risk of detection bias exists if outcome assessors were aware of treatment assignments, though blinding likely minimized this. Short 24-week primary endpoint may limit long-term efficacy assessment. |
Bahrs C, Andreas N, Lehmann T, Baumgart S, Jørgensen CS, Makarewicz O, et al. A randomised trial of simultaneous versus sequential pneumococcal vaccination in elderly. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2025 Aug 23. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.014 |
P: 123 vaccine-naïve adults aged ≥60
years (mean 65.2 ± 4.4 years; 61.8% female). I: Simultaneous vaccination with PCV13 and PPSV23. C: Sequential vaccination (PCV13 followed by PPSV23 after 6 months) or single PPSV23 vaccination. O: Change in antigen-specific memory B cells for four pneumococcal serotypes (ST3, ST14, ST19A, ST23F) at 27–28 weeks; secondary outcomes: IgG responses, memory B cells over 24 months, safety. |
Simultaneous vaccination did not significantly increase memory B cell responses compared to sequential or single vaccination at 27–28 weeks. Median changes in ST19A memory B cells were similar across groups (simultaneous 0.022%, sequential 0.022%, single 0.005%). At 6 months post-completion, sequential vaccination had slightly higher ST19A memory B cells. At 24 months, sequential vaccination achieved higher IgG against ST3 (GMFR 5.17) than simultaneous (2.82) or single (1.94). No serious adverse events occurred. | Low risk: Randomized design reduces selection bias. Monocentric study may limit generalizability. High follow-up and no serious adverse events support reliability. Small sample size could limit power |
Classen AY, Dietz T, Durán Graeff L, Eisenbeis S, Gastmeier P, Göpel S, et al. Impact of enhanced infection control and antimicrobial stewardship on infections by Clostridioides difficile, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales: a stepped-wedge cluster intervention study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2025 Aug 23. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.013 |
P: Patients in 15 departments across 5
German university hospitals, totaling >384,000 patient-days, with high
baseline incidence of CDI in 3 departments. I: Enhanced infection prevention and control (IPC) plus short-term antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) measures implemented sequentially using a stepped-wedge cluster design. C: Baseline standard IPC and AMS measures prior to enhancement. O: Incidence densities of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and bloodstream infections (BSI) by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCREB). |
Enhanced AMS combined with IPC led to a significant reduction in CDI incidence density (regression slope difference −0.089; p = 0.037). No significant changes were observed for VRE or 3GCREB BSI incidence (regression slope difference −0.19; p = 0.429). In haematology-oncology departments, AMS improved antibiotic prescription behaviour but did not alter clinical infection outcomes. Overall, interventions were effective for CDI but had limited impact on other hospital-acquired infections in settings with low baseline incidence. | Moderate risk: Stepped-wedge cluster design reduces contamination between clusters but may introduce temporal confounding. Low infection rates limit statistical power for BSI outcomes. Multicenter setting enhances generalizability. Possible detection bias if surveillance intensity changed over time, though objective microbiological endpoints reduce this risk. |
Copyright © ADVANCE-ID. All rights reserved.
ADVANCE-ID
Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health
National University of Singapore
Tahir Foundation Building
National University of Singapore
12 Science Drive 2, #10-01, Singapore 117549
+65 6516 4988