Issue: Newsletter 17 | April 1, 2026
| Citation of Articles | PICO | Main Results | Risk of Bias |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Neyra JA, Legrand M, Tidswell MA, Al-Khafaji A, Galphin C, Rains R, et al. Polymyxin B haemoadsorption in endotoxic septic shock (Tigris): a multicentre, open-label, Bayesian, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2026 Mar 23; doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(26)00047-0
• Editorial Commentary: Schupp T, Behnes M, Akin I. Implementing endotoxin adsorption for septic shock into clinical practice. Lancet Respir Med. 2026 Mar 23; doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(26)00055-X |
P: 157 adults with endotoxic septic shock requiring vasopressors, multiorgan failure, and endotoxin activity between 0.60 and 0.89 units. I: Two 90-120 minute sessions of polymyxin B haemoadsorption, administered 22 hours apart, in addition to standard of care. C: Standard of care alone. O: The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The key secondary outcome was 90-day mortality. |
Polymyxin B haemoadsorption was associated with a high probability of benefit for mortality. At 28 days, mortality was 39% in the polymyxin B group versus 45% in the control group (adjusted odds ratio 0.67, 95% credible interval 0.39–1.08), yielding a 95.3% posterior probability of benefit. The benefit was more pronounced at 90 days, with a 99.4% posterior probability of a lower mortality rate (adjusted odds ratio 0.54, 95% credible interval 0.32–0.87). Serious adverse events were more common in the treatment group (30% vs. 22%), but only two events were deemed related to the treatment. | Moderate risk: The open-label design is a significant limitation, creating a high risk of performance and detection bias, as clinicians and patients were aware of the treatment allocation. The study's credibility is strengthened by its randomized design, use of an intention-to-treat analysis, and hard mortality endpoints. However, the use of a Bayesian framework that borrowed from a prior trial (EUPHRATES) and the relatively small sample size are potential limitations that could influence the results. |
| Lotz C, Heckelmann J, Lendzian C, Herrmann J, Haack B, Gieselmann M, et al. Clinical and Immunologic Effects of Extracorporeal Cytokine Removal in Patients with Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Shock. 2026 Apr;65(4):637-47. doi:10.1097/SHK.0000000000002802 |
P: 31 adult patients with septic shock, an existing extracorporeal circuit (CVVHD or ECMO), and hyperinflammation (interleukin-6 >500 pg/mL). I: Standard care plus CytoSorb hemoadsorption, initiated within 24 hours of septic shock onset. C: Standard care alone, according to international sepsis guidelines. O: Primary: Cumulative norepinephrine dose over 72 hours. Secondary: Survival at 48/72 hours, ICU mortality, length of stay, duration of septic shock, and various immunological endpoints. |
Early hemoadsorption with CytoSorb did not improve outcomes and was associated with worse results on some measures. The primary outcome, cumulative norepinephrine dose at 72 hours, was not significantly different between the intervention and control groups (100.7 mg vs 78 mg, P=0.09). However, the control group had a significantly lower total vasopressor dose per hour alive (1.2 mg vs. 2.5 mg, P=0.0053) and significantly higher survival rates at both 48 hours (100% vs. 64%, P=0.01) and 72 hours (94% vs. 57%, P=0.03). No significant differences were observed in ICU mortality, length of stay, or humoral immune responses. | High risk: The open-label design, where patients, care providers, and the study team were all unblinded, creates a significant potential for performance and detection bias. The very small sample size (n=31) and single-center design severely limit the statistical power and the generalizability of the findings. Furthermore, the duration of hemoadsorption and the timing of adsorber changes were left to the discretion of the attending ICU team, introducing potential variability and inconsistency in the application of the intervention. |
| Chen WH, Beckett CG, Al-Ibrahim M, Datar R, Sikorski MJ, Liang Y, et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of a Trivalent Salmonella Conjugate Vaccine to S. Typhi, S. Typhimurium, and S. Enteritidis. J Infect Dis. 2026 Mar 26; doi:10.1093/infdis/jiag156 |
P: 80 healthy adults aged 20–47 years. I: A single dose of one of three formulations of a trivalent Salmonella conjugate vaccine (TSCV): full-strength (FS), half-strength (HS), or dilutional half-strength (dilHS). C: Placebo. O: Safety (local and systemic adverse events) and immunogenicity (serum antibody and antibody-secreting cell responses). |
All three vaccine formulations were well tolerated, with mild injection site pain and fatigue being the most common adverse events. The vaccines produced robust immune responses to all three Salmonella antigens, with response rates ranging from 85% to 100%. There was no statistically significant difference in the immune response observed between the three different vaccine strengths. As expected, participants who received the placebo did not show any significant antibody or cellular responses. | Low to Moderate risk: As a Phase 1/2a trial, the study has a small sample size (n=80), which limits statistical power and the generalizability of the findings to the target population of young children. The abstract does not specify if the trial was blinded, which could introduce performance or detection bias if it was an open-label study. The use of healthy adults as a surrogate for the pediatric target population is a standard practice for initial safety trials but means the immunogenicity results may not be directly transferable. |
|
Todd S, Euden J, Condie J, Aston S, Barlow G, Brookes-Howell L, et al. Procalcitonin testing combined with NEWS2 evaluation compared with usual care based on NEWS2 for identification of sepsis and antibiotic initiation in the emergency department in England and Wales (PRONTO): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2026 Mar 22; doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(25)00433-3
• Editorial Commentary: Cabral S, Rhee C. Rethinking the role of procalcitonin in suspected sepsis. Lancet Respir Med. 2026 Mar 22; doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(25)00471-0 |
P: 5453 adults (from an initial 7667 randomized) with suspected sepsis presenting to 20 UK emergency departments. I: Procalcitonin-guided care, using rapid procalcitonin testing in combination with standard NEWS2 assessment and a guidance algorithm. C: Usual care, based on standard clinical management with NEWS2 assessment. O: Co-primary endpoints were intravenous antibiotic initiation at 3 hours (for superiority) and 28-day mortality (for non-inferiority). |
The availability of a procalcitonin-guided algorithm did not reduce early antibiotic use; there was no significant difference in intravenous antibiotic initiation at 3 hours between the groups (48.4% in the procalcitonin group vs. 48.2% in the usual care group). However, the study found an unexpected reduction in 28-day mortality in the procalcitonin group (13.6%) compared to the usual care group (16.6%), a result that met the criteria for both non-inferiority and superiority. The reason for this mortality benefit was not explained by the study's analyses. | High risk: The open-label design, where participants, clinicians, and research staff were all unmasked to the treatment allocation, creates a significant risk of performance and detection bias. This knowledge could have influenced clinical behaviors in ways other than just following the algorithm, potentially confounding the results. Adherence to the intervention was also suboptimal, as clinicians only considered the procalcitonin result in about 65% of cases, which complicates the interpretation of the findings. |
| Wrønding T, Vomstein K, Lundgaard AT, DeLong K, Mollerup S, Mortensen B, et al. Vaginal microbiota transplantation for treatment of vaginal dysbiosis without the use of antibiotics: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial in women with vaginal dysbiosis. Lancet Microbe. 2026 Mar 26; doi:10.1016/j.lanmic.2025.101294 |
P: 49 premenopausal women (aged 18–40) with asymptomatic or symptomatic molecular vaginal dysbiosis (defined as <10% Lactobacillus spp and >20% combined Gardnerella spp, Fannyhessea vaginae, and Prevotella spp). I: Up to three administrations of vaginal microbiota transplant (VMT) across three menstrual cycles, without antibiotic pretreatment. C: Placebo administration. O: The primary outcome was the resolution of dysbiosis (defined as ≥70% Lactobacillus spp and <10% combined dysbiotic bacteria) at any timepoint during a six-cycle follow-up. |
The study found no significant difference in the resolution of dysbiosis between the VMT and placebo groups (Hazard Ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.20–2.16; p=0.49). Adverse events were equally common in both groups (42%), with no serious events reported. However, in a small, un-randomized extension study involving 10 participants who had not responded to the initial treatment, 50% achieved microbiome conversion after receiving an antiseptic pretreatment followed by another VMT. | Moderate risk: The study's main strength is its double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design, which minimizes performance and detection bias. However, the very small sample size (n=49) is a significant limitation, as it provides low statistical power to detect a true difference between the groups, increasing the risk of a false-negative result (Type II error). The single-center design may also limit the generalizability of the findings. |
| Lee JL, Kim HJ, Kim KM, Yi JM, Oh J, Lee EK, et al. Target-controlled infusion vs standard dosing of cefoxitin for surgical prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2026 Mar 17; doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2026.03.019 |
P: 2,494 adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery. I: Cefoxitin administered via a target-controlled infusion (TCI) pump targeting a specific plasma concentration (80 μg/mL). C: Standard dosing of cefoxitin (2 g every 2 hours). O: Primary: Incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) within 30 days. Secondary: Intraoperative cumulative cefoxitin dose and incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). |
The study found no difference in the primary outcome, with the incidence of surgical site infection being identical in both groups (5.6%). However, the target-controlled infusion (TCI) method resulted in a significantly lower intraoperative antibiotic exposure, with the median cumulative dose being approximately 30% less than in the standard dosing group (1.38 g vs. 2.00 g). There was no significant difference in the rates of acute kidney injury between the two groups. | Low to Moderate risk: The study's major strength is its large sample size (n=2,494) and randomized controlled design, which provides high statistical power for the primary outcome. The endpoints are objective, reducing the risk of detection bias. However, the abstract does not specify whether surgeons or outcome assessors were blinded to the treatment allocation, which could introduce bias. Additionally, as a single-center trial, the findings may have limited generalizability to other institutions with different patient populations or surgical protocols. |
| Bijukchhe SM, Marchevsky NG, Kibengo F, Sharma AK, Basi R, Cantrell L, et al. Optimising DTwP-containing vaccine infant immunisation schedules in Uganda and Nepal (OptImms): two open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trials. Lancet Infect Dis. 2026 Mar 19; doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(26)00053-8 |
P: 1727 healthy infants (876 in Uganda, 851 in Nepal) aged 42–50 days at enrollment. I: Four alternative DTwP-Hib-HepB vaccination schedules: two reduced-dose schedules (at 6 & 14 weeks; or 2 & 4 months) and two delayed three-dose schedules (at 2, 3, & 4 months; or 2, 4, & 6 months). C: The standard three-dose WHO schedule (at 6, 10, and 14 weeks). O: The primary outcome was the pre-booster IgG antibody response against pertussis antigens to assess if the two-dose schedules were non-inferior to the WHO schedule. Secondary outcomes included antibody responses at other time points. |
The reduced two-dose schedules failed to meet the non-inferiority criteria for pre-booster pertussis antibody levels compared to the standard WHO schedule. While the delayed three-dose schedules produced similar or higher antibody levels just before the booster, the standard WHO schedule was superior in generating higher antibody responses during the first 3 months of life. The authors concluded that the standard WHO schedule is preferable, especially in high-pertussis-burden settings, as it provides the best protection when infants are most vulnerable. | Moderate risk: The open-label design, where investigators and participants were not blinded to the vaccine schedule, could introduce performance bias. However, this risk is mitigated because the primary outcome is an objective laboratory measurement (antibody levels), which is not susceptible to subjective interpretation. The study's strengths include its large, multi-country, randomized design and the use of a pre-defined non-inferiority margin, which strengthens the validity of the primary analysis. |
| Wassil J, Fairman J, Fierro CA, Clark J, Bennett S, Johnson D, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a 31-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (VAX-31) in healthy adults aged 50 years and older from the USA: a phase 1/2, double-blinded, active-controlled, parallel-group, dose-finding randomised clinical trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2026 Mar 18; doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(26)00059-9 |
P: 1015 healthy, pneumococcal-naive adults aged 50 years or older. I: A single intramuscular dose of VAX-31, a 31-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), at one of three dose levels (low, mid, or high). C: A single intramuscular dose of the licensed 20-valent PCV (PCV20). O: Primary outcomes were safety and tolerability (adverse events). Secondary outcomes were immunogenicity, measured by serotype-specific opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) and IgG concentrations at 1 month. |
VAX-31 was well tolerated at all doses, with a safety profile comparable to the licensed PCV20. Most adverse events were mild to moderate. The mid-dose and high-dose VAX-31 formulations demonstrated immune responses that were non-inferior to PCV20 for all 20 shared serotypes. Furthermore, all three doses of VAX-31 elicited superior immune responses for the 11 additional serotypes not contained in PCV20. | Low risk: The study's double-blind, randomized, active-controlled design is a major strength, minimizing the risk of performance and detection bias. The use of a multi-center approach enhances the generalizability of the findings. As a Phase 1/2 trial, its primary focus is on safety and immunogenicity rather than clinical efficacy, which is an inherent limitation of early-phase research but not a flaw in its design for the stated objectives. |
| Last A, Abdurahman OS, Greenland K, Robinson A, Etu ES, Butcher R, et al. Double-dose azithromycin mass drug administration, facial cleanliness, and fly control measures for trachoma control in Oromia, Ethiopia (Stronger SAFE): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2026 Mar 24; doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(26)00024-1 |
P: 68 rural community clusters in Oromia, Ethiopia, with the primary outcome assessed in a cross-section of 3,480 children aged 1–9 years. I: The "Stronger SAFE" intervention, consisting of enhanced antibiotics (two annual doses of azithromycin 2 weeks apart) plus enhanced facial cleanliness and environmental improvement (fly control and a household behavior change intervention). C: The "Standard SAFE" intervention (control group), consisting of annual single-dose azithromycin mass drug administration plus standard promotion of latrine use and facial hygiene. O: The primary outcome was the prevalence of conjunctival Chlamydia trachomatis infection at 3 years. |
After three years of intervention, both groups saw a substantial reduction in the prevalence of C. trachomatis infection. However, the enhanced "Stronger SAFE" strategy provided no additional benefit compared to the standard SAFE strategy. The infection prevalence was 2.2% in the Stronger SAFE group versus 2.7% in the standard care group, a difference that was not statistically significant. The authors concluded that these enhanced measures are unlikely to accelerate trachoma elimination beyond what can be achieved with well-implemented, high-coverage standard SAFE. | Moderate risk: The study has a strong cluster-randomized design with an objective primary outcome (PCR test), and key personnel (lab technicians, statistician) were masked, which reduces detection and analysis bias. However, the open-label nature of the trial, where communities and field staff knew the intervention allocation, creates a risk of performance bias. This could have led to a "study effect," where the standard SAFE intervention in the control group was implemented with unusually high fidelity and coverage, potentially masking any true additional benefit from the enhanced interventions. |
| de Graaf H, Gbesemete DF, Hill AR, Fröberg J, Ibrahim MM, Dale AP, et al. Safety, colonisation kinetics, transmissibility, and immune correlates of protection in healthy adults inoculated with Bordetella pertussis in England: a single-centre, open-label, phase 1, controlled human infection study. Lancet Microbe. 2026 Mar 23; doi:10.1016/j.lanmic.2025.101313 |
P: 51 healthy volunteers aged 18–55 years who had previously received a whole-cell pertussis vaccine in childhood. I: Intranasal inoculation with wild-type Bordetella pertussis in an outpatient setting, with a subsequent re-inoculation for a subset of participants. C: The primary comparison was between volunteers who became colonized with B. pertussis and those who did not, to identify immunological correlates of protection. O: The primary outcome was safety. Secondary outcomes included the rate of bacterial colonization, identification of immunological biomarkers associated with protection, and assessment of transmission to close contacts. |
The outpatient controlled human infection model was found to be safe, with adverse events being mostly mild to moderate and no serious adverse events related to the inoculation. 40% of volunteers became colonized. Protection from colonization was associated with higher pre-existing antibody levels (including IgG and IgA) and specific T-cell responses. Infection-induced immunity was strong, as only 1 of 13 previously colonized volunteers became re-colonized upon rechallenge. No transmission was detected to 14 enrolled close contacts. | Low to Moderate risk: The study's open-label design is inherent to a human challenge model but introduces a risk of performance and detection bias for subjective outcomes like self-reported symptoms. However, the key outcomes of colonization and immunological response were measured by objective laboratory tests, minimizing this bias. The main limitations are the small, single-center sample size and the specific population (healthy adults primed with whole-cell vaccine), which restrict the generalizability of the findings to other populations, such as those primed with acellular vaccines. |

Copyright © ADVANCE-ID. All rights reserved.
ADVANCE-ID
Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health
National University of Singapore
Tahir Foundation Building
National University of Singapore
12 Science Drive 2, #10-01, Singapore 117549
+65 6516 4988