Issue: Newsletter 13 | February 1, 2026
| Citation of Articles | PICO | Main Results | Risk of Bias |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solomon T, Hooper C, Easton A, Rosala-Hallas A, Facer B, Moore P, et al. Safety and efficacy of adjunct dexamethasone in adults with herpes simplex virus encephalitis in the UK (DexEnceph): a multicentre, observer-blind, randomised, phase 3, controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2026 Feb;25(2):136–146. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(25)00454-5 |
P: 94 adults with HSV encephalitis (aged ≥16 years; 47 per group; confirmed HSV-1 or HSV-2 PCR in CSF), with 81 included in modified intention-to-treat analysis I: Intravenous dexamethasone 10 mg/kg four times daily for 4 days plus intravenous aciclovir 10 mg/kg three times daily for ≥14 days C: Intravenous aciclovir 10 mg/kg three times daily for ≥14 days alone O: Verbal memory score at 26 weeks (WMS-IV auditory memory index); safety and adverse events |
Adjunct dexamethasone did not significantly improve verbal memory at 26 weeks compared with aciclovir alone (mean score 71 vs 69; adjusted difference 1.77, 95% CI –9.57 to 13.12; p=0.76). Adverse events were similar between groups, occurring in 40% of the dexamethasone group and 38% of the control group. Serious adverse events were uncommon and comparable, including seizures requiring readmission (2% in each group) and thrombotic events observed only in the dexamethasone group (deep vein thrombosis 2%, pulmonary embolism 2%). No treatment-related deaths occurred, indicating a satisfactory safety profile but no efficacy benefit on cognitive outcomes. | Moderate risk: The observer-blind design with masked outcome assessors and statisticians reduces detection bias, but treatment allocation was not fully blinded, introducing potential performance bias. The modest sample size and early withdrawals (13% withdrew consent or were lost to follow-up) limit statistical power and may affect generalizability. Delayed initiation of dexamethasone (median 7 days after admission) could have diluted treatment effects, potentially biasing results toward null efficacy. |
| Louie T, Ribble W, Boccumini L, Johnson K, De Groote MA, Day J, et al. Safety and efficacy of CRS3123 in adults with a primary episode or first recurrence of Clostridioides difficile infection: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, vancomycin-controlled study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2026 Jan 22; doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00721-2 |
P: 43 adults with Clostridioides difficile infection (mean age 58.4 years; 77% female; 72% primary episode, 28% first recurrence), recruited across 14 sites in the USA and Canada I: CRS3123 200 mg orally twice daily for 10 days or CRS3123 400 mg orally twice daily for 10 days C: Oral vancomycin 125 mg four times daily for 10 days O: Clinical cure at test-of-cure visit (day 12–15); CDI recurrence at days 40 and 70; safety and adverse events |
Clinical cure at test-of-cure was high and comparable across groups (93% with CRS3123 200 mg, 100% with CRS3123 400 mg, and 93% with vancomycin), with no clinical failures observed. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate and similar between groups; drug-related adverse events occurred only in CRS3123 recipients and were grade 1–2, while the only serious adverse event (pneumonia) occurred in the vancomycin group and was unrelated to treatment. CDI recurrence through day 40 was lower with CRS3123 (0% with 200 mg; 7% with 400 mg) compared with vancomycin (23%), with one additional recurrence at day 70 in the CRS3123 400 mg group, suggesting comparable short-term efficacy and a potential reduction in recurrence. | Moderate risk: The randomized, double-blind, active-controlled design with stratification by CDI history reduces selection, performance, and detection bias. However, the small sample size limits statistical power and precision of efficacy estimates, particularly for recurrence outcomes. Missing data leading to indeterminate responses at test-of-cure and short follow-up for recurrence further constrain robustness and generalizability. |
| De Coster I, AbdelGhany M, Sarakinou E, Fineschi C, Marchetti E, La Gaetana R, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a conjugate vaccine candidate against Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A in healthy adults in Europe: a phase 1 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2026 Jan 23; doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00730-3 |
P: 96 healthy adults aged 18–50 years enrolled in a phase 1 trial (12 per low-dose group, 24 per full-dose group, 24 controls) in Belgium I: Two intramuscular doses (day 1 and day 169) of investigational Vi-CRM197+O:2-CRM197 conjugate vaccine (low-dose or full-dose formulations, with or without aluminium hydroxide) C: Control vaccines (Vi capsular polysaccharide vaccine for first dose and diphtheria–tetanus–acellular pertussis vaccine for second dose) O: Safety (solicited and unsolicited adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, serious adverse events); immunogenicity (anti-Vi and anti-O:2 IgG geometric mean concentrations, geometric mean ratios, and seroresponse rates) |
The investigational vaccine was well tolerated, with solicited local and systemic adverse events common but mostly mild and comparable to control, and no serious adverse events reported. Full-dose formulations induced substantially higher anti-Vi IgG responses at day 29 compared with control (GMR 53.01 without aluminium hydroxide and 31.55 with aluminium hydroxide vs 4.50), while full-dose and low-dose formulations without aluminium hydroxide elicited the strongest anti-O:2 IgG responses (GMRs 162.61 and 114.19 vs 1.27). High seroresponse rates were observed after a single dose (89–100% for anti-Vi IgG ≥4.3 μg/mL and 82–100% for ≥4-fold anti-O:2 IgG increase), whereas responses in the control group were markedly lower. A second dose did not meaningfully boost antibody responses. | Moderate risk: The observer-masked randomized design reduces detection bias for immunogenicity outcomes, but the single-centre phase 1 setting and small group sizes limit generalizability. Use of sealed-envelope randomisation may introduce selection bias if allocation concealment was imperfect. The study was not powered for comparative efficacy, and short-term follow-up for immunogenicity constrains inference on durability of response. |
| Salminen P, Salminen R, Kallio J, Hurme S, Nordström P, Rantanen T, et al. Antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis: ten-year follow-up of the APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2026 Jan 21; doi:10.1001/jama.2025.25921 |
P: 257 adults aged 18–60 years with CT-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis, originally enrolled in the APPAC randomized clinical trial and assigned to antibiotics, with 253 (98.4%) assessed at 10-year follow-up I: Antibiotic therapy (intravenous ertapenem 1 g/day for 3 days followed by oral levofloxacin 500 mg once daily and metronidazole 500 mg three times daily for 7 days) C: Appendectomy (open appendectomy; comparator group from original RCT for secondary outcomes) O: 10-year appendicitis recurrence (histopathologically confirmed); cumulative appendectomy rate; complications; quality of life |
Over 10 years, the true appendicitis recurrence rate among patients initially treated with antibiotics was 37.8% (95% CI 31.6%–44.1%), and the cumulative appendectomy rate was 44.3% (95% CI 38.2%–50.4%). Complications were significantly lower in the antibiotics group compared with the appendectomy group (8.5% vs 27.4%, P<.001). No significant difference in long-term quality of life was observed between treatment strategies (median health index value 1.0 in both groups, P=.18). These findings indicate that although nearly half of patients treated with antibiotics eventually underwent appendectomy, a substantial proportion avoided surgery long term with fewer overall complications. | Moderate risk: This analysis represents a long-term observational follow-up of a randomized trial, preserving the strengths of initial randomization but introducing potential attrition and post-randomization bias over 10 years. Near-complete follow-up (98.4%) minimizes attrition bias, and histopathologic confirmation strengthens outcome validity. However, treatment crossover, post hoc analyses, and reliance on secondary and observational endpoints limit causal inference compared with the original RCT design. |
| Donovan J, Bang ND, Trinh Dong HK, Ho DTN, Nguyen TAT, Nguyen TTH, et al. Genotype-stratified adjunctive dexamethasone for tuberculous meningitis in HIV-negative adults: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial. Nat Med. 2026 Jan 15; doi:10.1038/s41591-025-04138-z |
P: 702 HIV-negative Vietnamese adults with tuberculous meningitis enrolled in a phase 3 trial, including 613 LTA4H CC- or CT-genotype participants randomized (305 dexamethasone; 308 placebo) and 89 TT-genotype participants treated with open-label dexamethasone I: Adjunctive dexamethasone for 6–8 weeks in addition to standard antituberculous therapy C: Placebo (for LTA4H CC- and CT-genotype participants); no randomized comparator for TT-genotype participants O: Composite of all-cause death or new neurological event within 12 months; serious adverse events |
Among LTA4H CC- and CT-genotype participants, the primary endpoint occurred in 35.4% of patients receiving dexamethasone and 35.7% receiving placebo (HR 0.99, 96% CI 0.75–1.31), demonstrating no superiority of dexamethasone and failing to establish noninferiority of placebo. No heterogeneity of treatment effect was observed across prespecified subgroups or individual genotypes. The number of primary outcome events exceeded the prespecified target, strengthening precision but not altering conclusions. TT-genotype participants receiving open-label dexamethasone had a similar event rate (31.5%) to CC and CT groups, with no significant outcome advantage. Serious adverse events were common but comparable between dexamethasone and placebo in CC/CT participants (52.8% vs 51.9%), indicating acceptable safety without clinical efficacy benefit in these genotypes. | Moderate risk: The randomized, placebo-controlled design with adequate event accrual reduces selection and detection bias in CC and CT genotypes. However, exclusion of TT-genotype participants from randomization and their open-label treatment limits genotype-wide causal inference. The composite endpoint may dilute effects on mortality alone, and genotype-stratified analyses reduce power for subgroup conclusions. Overall internal validity is reasonable, but biological stratification and complex design constrain generalizability. |
| Libby TE, Karani A, Tickell KD, Akech D, Singa B, Rwigi D, et al. The effect of a 5-day course of azithromycin on Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage and antimicrobial resistance among Kenyan children discharged from hospital. J Infect Dis. 2026 Jan 16; doi:10.1093/infdis/jiag028 |
P: 1,398 hospitalized Kenyan children enrolled in a randomized trial and followed post-discharge (702 azithromycin; 696 placebo), with pneumococcal resistance assessed in a random sample of isolates I: Oral azithromycin for 5 days administered at hospital discharge C: Placebo O: Nasopharyngeal pneumococcal carriage and proportion of isolates resistant to azithromycin at discharge, 3 months, and 6 months |
Pneumococcal carriage did not differ between azithromycin and placebo groups at discharge (22.5% vs 24.6%, P=.40), 3 months (65.6% vs 67.0%; PR 0.98, 95% CI 0.90–1.06), or 6 months (66.7% vs 66.5%; PR 1.00, 95% CI 0.92–1.08). Azithromycin resistance among isolates was similar between groups at 3 months (13.2% vs 12.5%; PR 1.06, 95% CI 0.86–1.66) and 6 months (16.7% vs 17.6%; PR 1.01, 95% CI 0.69–1.49). High background inpatient antibiotic exposure (89.6% of children) likely attenuated any additional effect of post-discharge azithromycin on carriage or resistance. | Moderate risk: The double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized design with stratification by site limits selection and performance bias. However, resistance outcomes were assessed only in a random subset of isolates, reducing precision. High baseline and inpatient antibiotic use may have confounded the intervention effect, and findings may not generalize to lower antibiotic-exposure settings. |
|
Gaston DC, Humphries RM, Lewis AA, Gatto CL, Wang L, Nelson GE, et al. Effect of direct-from-blood bacterial testing on antibiotics administration in adults presenting with acute infection: a randomized trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2026 Jan 15; doi:10.1093/cid/ciaf677
• Editorial Commentary: Coffey KC, Shenoy ES, Turbett SE. The tantalizing pursuit for a perfect diagnostic test: balancing innovation with stewardship. Clin Infect Dis. 2026 Jan 15; doi:10.1093/cid/ciaf674 |
P: 500 hospitalized adults with suspected infection receiving empiric intravenous vancomycin in the emergency department of an academic medical center I: Direct-from-blood bacterial testing in addition to standard blood cultures C: Standard blood cultures alone (usual care) O: Time from randomization to last dose of intravenous vancomycin and systemic antipseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotics; clinical outcomes |
Direct-from-blood bacterial testing reduced the time to results by a median of 5.2 days (0.4 vs 5.5 days). However, time to last dose of intravenous vancomycin did not differ significantly between groups (median 12.5 vs 19.0 hours; HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.90–1.28; P=0.42), nor did time to last dose of systemic antipseudomonal beta-lactams (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.87–1.24). Clinical outcomes were also similar, indicating no meaningful impact of the intervention on antibiotic de-escalation or patient outcomes. | Low to moderate risk: Randomized, pragmatic design with well-defined primary and secondary outcomes reduces selection and detection bias. Open-label design could influence clinician behavior but objective timing endpoints limit performance bias. Single-center setting may limit generalizability. No significant missing data reported, minimizing attrition bias. |
| Miller LG, Kolar S, Sanders J, Williamson J, Allyn PR, Baang J, et al. A phase 2a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of an intravenous (IV) bacteriophage cocktail (AP-SA02) vs. placebo in combination with best available antibiotic therapy (BAT) in patients with complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2026 Jan 11;13(Suppl 1):ofaf695.022. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.022 |
P: 42 adults with complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (29 AP-SA02; 13 placebo) enrolled across 17 sites (95% US), with MRSA in 39–44% of participants I: Intravenous bacteriophage cocktail AP-SA02 q6h for 5 days plus best-available therapy (BAT) C: Placebo plus BAT O: Clinical response at Test of Cure (Day 12), post-BAT, and End of Study (4 weeks after BAT); safety; secondary outcomes including CRP normalization, time to negative blood culture, ICU/hospital stay |
Clinical response at Day 12 was higher in the AP-SA02 group versus placebo (88% vs 58% by blinded site investigators, p=0.047; 83% vs 58% by independent adjudication). At post-BAT and EOS, non-response/relapse rates were 0% in AP-SA02 versus 23–25% in placebo (p<0.025). Patients receiving AP-SA02 showed trends toward faster CRP normalization, shorter time to negative blood culture, and reduced ICU/hospital stay. Treatment-emergent adverse events were low and comparable (6% AP-SA02 vs 0% placebo). Overall, AP-SA02 demonstrated early and sustained clinical efficacy with a favorable safety profile. | Moderate risk: Phase 2a, double-blind, randomized design with blinded adjudication reduces selection and detection bias. Small sample size (42 patients) limits statistical power and precision, particularly for subgroup analyses. Single-country predominance (95% US sites) may affect generalizability. Safety follow-up was limited to 4 weeks post-therapy; longer-term outcomes remain unknown. |
| Saso A, Fröberg J, Jobe H, Eleveld M, Okoye M, Kanteh E, et al. Mucosal immune responses to Bordetella pertussis in Gambian infants after maternal and primary vaccination: an immunological substudy of a single-centre, randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 4 trial. Lancet Microbe. 2026 Jan 7;7(1101219): doi:10.1016/j.lanmic.2025.101219 |
P: 160 infants enrolled in the Gambian Pertussis Study (GaPs), born to healthy mothers aged 18–40 years who received either Tdap–IPV or TT vaccine during pregnancy I: Infant primary immunisation series with three doses of diphtheria–tetanus–whole-cell pertussis (DTwP) vaccine at 8, 12, and 16 weeks C: Infant primary immunisation series with three doses of diphtheria–tetanus–acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine at the same schedule O: Nasal mucosal IgG and IgA to B pertussis and pertussis toxin, and nasal T-cell-associated cytokines at 17 weeks and 9 months |
Infants born to Tdap–IPV–vaccinated mothers had higher maternally derived nasal anti-pertussis toxin and anti-B pertussis IgG at 8 weeks pre-vaccination. After primary immunisation, DTwP-vaccinated infants had higher nasal anti-B pertussis IgG and stronger nasal T-cell cytokine responses than DTaP-vaccinated infants, irrespective of maternal vaccine. DTaP-vaccinated infants born to Tdap–IPV–vaccinated mothers showed the lowest mucosal IgG responses, indicating blunting by maternal antibodies. Overall, DTwP induced broader mucosal humoral and cellular immunity, while maternal Tdap–IPV modulated pertussis toxin-specific IgG responses. | Moderate risk: Randomised, double-blind design for maternal and infant allocation reduces selection and detection bias. Single-centre immunological substudy and relatively small sample size limit generalizability. Measurement of nasal antibodies and cytokines is objective, but mucosal sampling in infants may be variable. Findings are primarily mechanistic; clinical protection outcomes were not directly measured. |
|
Scott K Heysell, Stellah G Mpagama, Edwin Nuwagira, Bibie Said, Mark Conaway, Megan Null, et al. Immediate or high-dose antituberculosis therapy for HIV-related sepsis in Tanzania and Uganda (ATLAS): a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled, 2 × 2 factorial, superiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2026 Jan 28; doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00747-9
• Comment: Azimia M, Menzies D. Strength of ATLAS or lady luck in a sepsis management trial? Lancet Infect Dis. 2026 Jan 28; doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(26)00025-3 |
P: 395 adults living with HIV hospitalised with sepsis in Tanzania and Uganda (57% female, 43% male; all Black; 204 [52%] with microbiologically confirmed TB) I: Immediate antituberculosis therapy, either conventional-dose (rifampicin 10 mg/kg, isoniazid 5 mg/kg, pyrazinamide, ethambutol) or high-dose (rifampicin 30 mg/kg, isoniazid 7.5 mg/kg, pyrazinamide, ethambutol) daily for 28 days C: Diagnosis-dependent antituberculosis therapy (started only after clinical or microbiological confirmation), conventional- or high-dose O: 28-day mortality, adverse events |
Overall 28-day mortality did not differ between immediate versus diagnosis-dependent therapy (25% vs 25%; aHR 0.99, 95% CI 0.67–1.46) or high-dose versus conventional-dose therapy (26% vs 25%; aHR 1.07, 95% CI 0.72–1.59). In patients with confirmed tuberculosis, immediate conventional-dose therapy reduced 28-day mortality compared with diagnosis-dependent conventional-dose therapy (12% vs 34%; aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13–0.82; p=0.015). No significant differences in adverse events were observed, though drug-induced liver injury was numerically higher in the immediate high-dose group. | Moderate risk: Open-label design could introduce performance or detection bias. Randomisation with allocation concealment and stratification by country/mental status strengthens internal validity. High follow-up completion for primary outcome minimizes attrition bias, but subgroup analyses are limited by smaller numbers, potentially affecting precision of effect estimates. Adherence challenges in critically ill patients may influence intervention effectiveness. |
Ergönül Ö, Kolsuz S, Figueroa JP. Tetanus. Lancet. 2026 Jan 13;doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01579-X
Summary: This narrative review explores the gut–heart axis, highlighting how intestinal dysbiosis, impaired gut barrier integrity, immune activation, and microbiota-derived metabolites contribute to cardiovascular diseases, with a particular focus on infective endocarditis arising from gut bacterial translocation, and discusses emerging preventive and therapeutic strategies including microbiota modulation and personalized medicine.

Copyright © ADVANCE-ID. All rights reserved.
ADVANCE-ID
Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health
National University of Singapore
Tahir Foundation Building
National University of Singapore
12 Science Drive 2, #10-01, Singapore 117549
+65 6516 4988